religion

You are currently browsing articles tagged religion.

Sister Margaret McBride

In November, a women 11 weeks pregnant came into a Phoenix hospital with a life threatening condition that needed immediate action to save her life.  She was given the choice to abort her baby or keep it and informed about how keeping the pregnancy would endanger her life.  She made her choice to live and the Nun on staff thought that saving the life of the mother followed Directive 47 in the U.S. Catholic Church’s ethical guidelines for health care providers — that allows, in some circumstance, procedures that could kill the fetus to save the mother.  Upon hearing that Sister Margaret McBride allowed the abortion to save the mother’s life, Bishop Thomas J. Olmsted immediate excommunicated the nun.
It is certainly a compelling reason to abort an 11 week old fetus to save the life of the mother, especially if the fetus would not have survived had the mother died.  I think the Sister McBride made the correct and humane decision.  The most compelling argument in the NPR article was this part:

“In the case of priests who are credibly accused and known to be guilty of sexually abusing children, they are in a sense let off the hook,” Doyle says.

Doyle says no pedophile priests have been excommunicated. When priests have been caught, he says, their bishops have protected them, and it has taken years or decades to defrock them, if ever.

“Yet in this instance we have a sister who was trying to save the life of a woman, and what happens to her? The bishop swoops down [and] declares her excommunicated before he even looks at all the facts of the case,” Doyle says.

The church’s suggestion would be to let both the mother and the fetus die, rather than abort to save the life of the mother.  It is a double standard for the church to excommunicate a nun for saving the life of this women and then take no action to excommunicate priests who rape children repeatedly, but rather move them from one parish to another.

Science put religious “upbringings” and convictions to shame with it’s level of rationality and requirements for evidence.

Richard Dawkins explains:

CHAPTER IV. MAKING NO SENSE OF IT ALL


Ego Problem

Humility must be my plan.

Worship Jesus as much as I can.

He wants me to praise him!

(Why did Mary raise him

to be such an arrogant man?)


Lost Cause

Lord God made a pretty bad bet

sending Jesus to settle my debt.

He who died for my sins

can just do it again

‘cause I ain’t stopped committin’ ‘em yet.

Intercession

Sweet Jesus, you know I adore you,

but plenty of folks lived before you.

You came late to the scene

if you know what I mean.

Have mercy on them, I implore you.

J.C., you have always been kind.

Here’s a thought that I hope you won’t mind.

You could hold make-up classes

to save all their asses

and get yourself out of this bind.

Holy Arithmetic

I can picture the Heavenly Host -

But a Father, a Son and a Ghost?

How one dude can be three

is a mystery to me –

That’s the puzzle that puzzles me most.

Heavenly Choices

Some problems with heaven disturb me.

Won’t those stuffy Believers perturb me?

Do I get a new body?

Do I get to be naughty?

Or will God and his crew try to curb me?

Lord, you’ve promised no sorrow or woe there.

And the angels put on quite a show there.

Here’s the question complex:

Do the angels like sex?

If it’s no, then I don’t want to go there.

Fishers of Men

(Fish? Or Cut Bait?)

Christ said, Fish for men in the sea!

I’ve taken his words literally.

But I cast my net down

and I pull up a clown.

That advice isn’t workin’ for me.

The Gospel, According to Mason and Dixon

In the South there are Christians galore.

These people adore keeping score.

Being gay is a sin,

if you’re poor you can’t win,

if you’re black they subtract even more.

The Savior, who sees this as well,

thinks His lessons were clear as a bell.

These folks aren’t worth savin’

the way they’re behavin’ –

I’m sendin’ ‘em all straight to Hell.


J. C. Is O.K.

J. C. was a very cool dude –

way ahead of his time (which was crude.)

We could use him these days -

the Progressives would praise,

but Conservatives might come unglued.

But Is God A Republican?

That question is worth some debate.

Democratic ideals aren’t so great.

Jesus talked about caring

and giving and sharing

but strong folks need someone to hate.

Our wealth we must never deplete.

All these hand-outs could spell our defeat.

And when things go awry

blame some devilish guy.

That’s the sensible way to compete.

God Talks with Al Gore About Global Warming

You – and your science – are small.

You forget whose controlling it all.

I hate to defy you

but if I want to fry you

I won’t need those charts on the wall.

Diagnosing the Christian Deity

This case is exceedingly odd.

The guy’s got his shorts in a wad.

His delusions are grand

and he can’t understand

his name is not Almighty God.

Though he talks like a happy high-liver,

his tantrums can make a man quiver.

Mood swings are excessive -

he’s passive-aggressive,

makes promises he can’t deliver.

Sometimes he’s quite a cajoler –

more often a nasty controller.

Today – a cool sage.

Tomorrow – hot rage!

This God-boy is clearly bi-polar.

The Fundamental Facts

Evolution is really quite odd -

a theory we cannot applaud.

You find scholars impressive?

These fools are obsessive -

and EVIL for challenging God!

Poor Darwin did not recognize

that Truth must descend from the skies.

Let me ask once again:

Are you monkeys or men?

Good men never monkey with lies!

Riddle: Where In Hell Are We?

The heat from this place can be felt

when your brain does a gradual melt.

It’s quite large, but feels tight

when you don’t behave right.

Give up? It’s your own Bible Belt!


Another Riddle

Christians have put their own spin

on manners and morals and sin.

There’s not much they miss,

but with angels they guess

How many can dance on a pin?


Why Won’t God Reveal Himself?

I used to enjoy blind-man’s-bluff,

hide-and-seek, and other kid-stuff.

But this Hider’s still hidin’.

that’s why I’m decidin’

This game has gone on long enough.

Devilish Logic

Sometimes I express my frustration

with a world full of cruel devastation.

Then some church-going jerk

tells me: Satan’s at work!

But God is in charge of salvation!


Pastoral Counseling

If you think you’re a miserable sinner,

and your prospects for Heaven grow thinner,

Don’t despair; just BELIEVE!

God has tricks up his sleeve.

He could still declare you a winner.

Free At Last!

I have prayed, I have bowed, I have scraped.

My brain has been washed and reshaped.

Now this 3-in-1 God

is revealed as a fraud.

Thank the Lord, I have finally escaped!

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I humbly thank and dedicate this outrageous little book -

To my dear dad, who loved Limericks, and who would be sitting high in Paradise, if only it existed.

To the dedicated church and Sunday school preachers and teachers who did they best to imbue me with their versions of Truth.

To my mother, who was always mercifully silent on such subjects.

To my three deeply moral and highly irreverent sisters.

To my honest old aunty who, on my Lutheran confirmation day, looked me straight in the eyes and said, “You don’t really believe all that crap, do you?”

And to many God-fearing Christian friends who have helped me to understand how seriously I reject their view of this world and whatever lies beyond. Such faith leaves me in a state of shock and awe.

- PeachTree Grandma

The Unholy Scriptures: Summarized and Pulverized used with permission by LiberatedMind.com

CHAPTER III. GETTING THE WORD OUT


The Council of Nicaea

(Or: The Value of a Good Editor)

Boys, you’ve written a good, strong beginnin’

Now follow with plenty of sinnin’.

We need rape, we need war,

and a whole lot of gore,

and nothin’ that’s written by women.

That virginal twist was inspired.

What talented fellas I hired!

A bush that is burnin’

will keep pages turnin’

but poetry sure makes me tired.

Your description of heaven is swell.

Let’s expand on the fires of hell.

Boys, we’re nearly all done

and I do hafta run –

Do you think that this damned thing will sell?

Editing Genesis

Okay, fellas, gimme a break.

I’m a writer myself, for Christ’s sake!

That garden, I’ll buy -

and a weak-minded guy -

but you can’t keep the talking snake!

Editing the Virgin Birth

That’s an awfully bold fiction we’re shovin’

on people who understand lovin’.

But keep it! That story

leads Mary to glory,

along with the Bun in her oven.

The Easter Story (First Draft)

This chapter’s in really rough shape.

It reads like the work of an ape!

Can we leave this alone?

Empty tomb? Rolling stone?

A dead guy who makes his escape?

Nah, it won’t need a whole lot of fixin’ –

We do have one huge contradiction:

Nobody can rise

From a violent demise.

Let’s label it Creative Fiction!


The First Rejection Note

Such stories! How did you conceive ‘em?

You must have been tempted to heave ‘em!

Some tales are so wild

they would boggle a child.

Did you really believe we’d believe ‘em?

Acceptance – At Last!

I can’t say it doesn’t have flaws,

but we’ll publish this thing, just because

these words will control

the most miserable soul.

Yes, you’ve earned our respect and applause.

Human beings want to feel they are blessed.

Who wants a reality test?

Simple rulebooks are fine

to keep masses in line

but a guy in the sky is the best!


Public Relations

(Slogan: Truth or Consequences)

This Book contains God’s holy story –

a message of peace, hope and glory.

Anyone to reject it

is gonna regret it!

By God, make the consequence gory!

Things Get Ugly

Here’s my quick-and-dirty rendition

of a horror they called Inquisition.

Things got tougher and tougher -

but many must suffer

when God fortifies his position.

The Reformation

(Or: Martin Luther, the Decider)

Some say I am just splitting hairs,

but this Bible needs further repairs

so peasants can read it –

they’re the ones who will need it –

they can’t go through life unawares!

Pompous words are a problem to me.

They’re not user-friendly, you see.

Now, the miracles stay –

those are needed today –

people like magic acts, I agree.

That cannibal stuff needs revision –

I don’t care if I suffer derision.

Eat BREAD and drink WINE

or you’re no friend of mine.

That’s my answer! My final decision!

Next and last, Chapter 4 tomorrow!

The Unholy Scriptures: Summarized and Pulverized used with permission by LiberatedMind.com

Continued from Chapter I.  Written by PeachTree Grandma.

CHAPTER II. THE NEW TESTAMENT


The Not-So-Immaculate Conception

Christian girls know that sex is taboo –

so many fun things they can’t do.

Mary sinned and she hid it.

She said a Ghost did it.

(Don’t know how she sold that, do you?)


Finding the Christ Child

Have you tried to follow a star?

That tactic won’t get you too far.

A star will elude

and you’ll have to conclude

that wherever you go, there you are.

Temple Elders Discuss the Boy Wonder

My God, but this kid takes the prize.”

I can hardly believe my own eyes!”

I say that he’s fakin’!”

Bets need to be taken!”

A wise-ass? Or wonderfully wise?”

The Groupies

Twelve disciples – not one with a mate –

hanging out with The Lord until late.

I make no suggestion -

I just raise the question:

Do YOU think those cowboys were straight?


The Apostle Paul’s Conversion

(Or: A Funny Thing Happened on the Road to Damascus . . .)

There once was a tyrant named Saul.

That king wasn’t Godly at all.

God said, Presto! You’re blind!

Now maybe you’ll mind!

And that is how Saul became Paul.

Paul’s Advice Regarding Marriage

(Or: How to Douse Your Passion in a Jiffy)

After that, Paul was pretty uptight.

Hot sex really gave him a fright.

Better marry than burn!”

That’s what he’d have us learn.

(I’m not too convinced he was right.)

Magic Trick #1: The Wedding at Cana

With the wine gone, the guests got abusive.

Jesus said, Please don’t think me intrusive.

I’ll make everything fine –

I’ll turn water to wine!

(That’s a miracle I could make use of!)

Magic Trick #2: Jesus Feeds the Multitudes

A boy with five loaves and three fishes

tried to satisfy everyone’s wishes.

Jesus looked to the sky,

shouted out MULTIPLY!

And behold! He filled hundreds of dishes!

Cheap Tricks (#3 and 4):

Jesus bragged, I don’t know if I ought-er -

but I can raise up your dead daughter.

What’s more, if you like,

I can take a wet hike.

Watch me! I am walkin’ on water!


Jesus Expels Money-Changers From the Temple

When money-men counted their loot

Our Lord had to give ‘em the boot.

Oh, what would he say

about Wall Street today?

Holy Moses! This place is a hoot!

On the Road to Emmaus

Down the road two disciples were goin’

when a spook up ahead started glowin’.

That’s our dead friend, J.C.!

He’s alive as can be!

What a sad lack of faith we’ve been showin’!


Cleanliness is Next to Godliness

His robes were as white as the snow -

quite a trick in the desert, you know.

Jesus knew how to groom

from manger to tomb –

as the Hollywood movies will show.

Jesus Is Finished

A Limerick is not the right format

for death – so I will not explore that.

God asked him to die

And he had to comply.

Oh, why was he such a damned doormat?

Next up, Chapter III!

The Unholy Scriptures: Summarized and Pulverized used with permission by LiberatedMind.com

A dear reader of mine wrote these witty limericks about the bible.  She asked that her identity be anonymous and took on the pen name “PeachTree Grandma”.  She tells me her grandchildren are having their brains washed and spun-dry in a fundamental Christian school every day, plus church on Sunday, which breaks her heart.  These delightful writings poke fun at the ludicrous bible stories, enjoy and please comment below if you have the time.  I am certain she would appreciate feedback. :)

THE UNHOLY SCRIPTURES:

Summarized and Pulverized

by PEACHTREE GRANDMA

FOREWORD

This was written from utter frustration

Now I’m sending it out to the nation.

Freethinkers, unite!

We must fight for the right

To engage in some sane conversation.

CHAPTER I. THE OLD TESTAMENT


In the Beginning

Modern scholars, who claim to be bright

say the world wasn’t built overnight.

That thinking must go.

This is God’s Magic Show –

fast-moving, designed to excite.

First act was a lighting display,

Making sunshine was mere child’s play.

Then he strung up the stars,

and the ball we call ours.

(He’s holding those strings yet today.)

Wind and water were next; after that,

forms of life – tall and small, fat and flat.

He performed for six days,

then He needed some praise

so He pulled YOU and ME from his hat!

Paradise Lost

Eden was such a fine place,

but Adam and Eve fell from grace.

A forked tongue was to blame –

yes, a snake brought them shame.

God hissed, What an utter disgrace!


And God’s heart continued to harden.

He was not in the mood for a pardon.

I’ll make you aware

that your bodies are bare,

then kick your butts out of this garden!


High and Dry

It’s your duty, Noah! Don’t shrink!

Go build me a ship that won’t sink.

Bring the critters aboard!

Don’t complain to the Lord!

You’ll get used to the almighty stink.

Bring some dinosaurs too – don’t forget ‘em.

They might go extinct if we let ‘em.

Bring extras! I fear

we have meat-eaters here

and it wouldn’t be wise to upset ‘em.

Forty days, forty nights they all float.

They get off on a mountain remote.

What? You think it’s a fable?

Well, swim if you’re able!

You don’t get to ride on our boat!

Joseph and his Dandy Coat

Joseph’s dad liked him better than best -

Gave him clothes that outdid all the rest.

Said his mean, jealous brothers,

If we had our druthers,

we’d put this young buck to the test.

Let’s throw his ass down a deep well!

That’s something he won’t live to tell!

But God helped him out –

(This gets lengthy, no doubt.

Short version: It all turned out swell.)

Jonah Gets Lucky

A whale swimming deep in the sea

sucked in Jonah as slick as could be,

Spit him back – a whole man!

(Swallow that, if you can

but it sounds pretty fishy to me.)


Daniel Gets Lucky Too!

Now picture this scene: (I’m sure tryin’!)

A boy and a ravenous lion.

The kid’s in a huddle,

the beast wants to cuddle.

(Do ya’ think it’s the lion that’s lyin’?)


Shadrak, Meshak, and Abendigo

Three fellas with weird-sounding names

got a chance to go dance in the flames

They should have been torched

but they weren’t even scorched.

Why CAN’T God keep playing these games?


A Towering Truth

Some Biblical types were hardscrabble.

The worst were no better than rabble.

They hollered in tongues

at the top of their lungs.

and that’s how we got the word BABBLE.


David Slays Goliath

His slingshot was merely a toy

and David was such a small boy.

Yet he killed a giant tall

with no trouble at all.

(Now a tale that tall I enjoy!)


Biblical Hussies

A. Delilah Cuts Up

That girl is a Biblical floozy.

With partners she’s never been choosy

Sampson falls in her lair.

She cuts off his hair –

(Read the story – it’s really a doozy!)

B. Salome Cuts Down John-the-Baptist

This hussy sure knows how to swish.

King says, Darlin, what is you wish?

She says: John-Boy – DEAD! I want his fat head!

Cut it off! Bring it here on a dish!


C. Lot’s Wife Is Petrified

God declares: Soddom’s a hole!

Better leave before heads start to roll.

Straight ahead! Do not halt!

Or I’ll turn you to salt!

But that woman has no self-control

Moses Leads His People Out of Egypt

The desert would have to be crossed,

though the map and directions were tossed.

They wandered and wandered,

four decades they squandered.

Their leader was hopelessly lost.

They found moral guidance, however –

ten rules to confuse us forever:

Don’t be crude! Don’t have fun!

Worship Me, or you’re done!

All in all, quite a useless endeavor.

More About Moses and Those Blasted Commandments

Moses hiked up Mt. Sinai alone

to follow a light he’d been shown.

He and God had a talk;

God wrote rules on a rock.

(Who says nothing’s written in stone?)

Manna in the Desert

When travelers were in a bad way,

God used to throw manna, they say.

Many folks are still needy,

but God’s gotten greedy.

He’s tossin’ no biscuits today.

Moses Parts the Waters

Did you know the Red Sea can divide?

Make a passage that’s straight, dry and wide?

There isn’t much to it,

but in order to do it,

you have to have God on your side.

Once all the good guys have passed through,

here’s another cool trick you can do:

Close that ocean up tight!

It’s a rib-tickling sight

when you drown all the clowns who pursue!

Chapter II: The New Testament is up next!

The Unholy Scriptures: Summarized and Pulverized used with permission by LiberatedMind.com

Every 10 years the media re-discovers the Catholic church’s campaign to cover up child rape that occurs in their ranks.  Typically, interest in holding the church’s feet to the fire wanes and the national media forgets about them for a time.  This round, however involves the top dog Pope Benedict.  Prior to being elected Pope, Benedict (known as Cardinal Ratzinger) was head of a disciplinary department for wayward priests.  Dealing with child rape cases was in his job description and he arguably knows more about the intricacies of the cover up than any other Cardinal or Bishop alive today.

New developments on this front come rapid fire.  So here is a brief overview of the last week:

Connecticut Bishops fight sex abuse bill (April.11.2010)

Connecticut legislature is proposing a bill that would remove the statute of limitations on child sexual abuse cases. Conneticut Law currently limits sexual abuse victims 30 years past their 18th birthday to file a lawsuit. The proposed change to the law would rescind that statute of limitations, allowing child abuse victims to sue beyond their 48th birthday.

Considering that many previously quiet victims are around the age of 50, the church in conneticut has taken a very vocal stance against this proposal.  Signed by the bishops of Conneticut, a letter posted on their website suggests that this new law would put “all Church institutions, including your parish, at risk.”  This leads us to wonder… how many pedophiles does the Connecticut church have in the closet?  Are there so many child rape victims over the age of 48 that they fear bankruptcy?

Read more: CNN.com

Writing on the Wall: Pope’s signature attached to key letters (April.9.2010)

The Pope’s correspondence in postponing the defrocking of California Priest Rev Kiesle has be discovered linking him to the 5 year wait in defrocking the priest after he was found guilty and sentenced to 3 years probation for molesting two young boys.  Ratzinger wrote that the “good of the universal church” needed to be considered when defrocking a priest, putting the interest of the church before the well being of the victims and Kiesle’s parishioners.

Via the BBC: “Rev Kiesle was sentenced to three years of probation in 1978 for lewd conduct with two young boys in San Francisco. It said the Oakland diocese had recommended Kiesle’s removal in 1981 but that that did not happen until 1987.

Cardinal Ratzinger took over the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which deals with sex abuse cases, in 1981.

AP says the 1985 correspondence, written in Latin, shows Cardinal Ratzinger saying that Kiesle’s removal would need careful review.

Cardinal Ratzinger urged “as much paternal care as possible” for Kiesle.

Kiesle was sentenced to six years in prison in 2004 after admitting molesting a young girl in 1995.

Kiesle is now 63 and is on the registered sex offenders list in California.”

British Scientist Richard Dawkins threatens to arrest Pope Benedict (April.11.2010)

Outspoken Atheist and Biologist Richard Dawkins has set in motion the legal measures necessary to arrest Pope Benedict on his next visit to Britain.

Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, the atheist author, have asked human rights lawyers to produce a case for charging Pope Benedict XVI over his alleged cover-up of sexual abuse in the Catholic church.

The pair believe they can exploit the same legal principle used to arrest Augusto Pinochet, the late Chilean dictator, when he visited Britain in 1998.

Dawkins and Hitchens believe the Pope would be unable to claim diplomatic immunity from arrest because, although his tour is categorised as a state visit, he is not the head of a state recognised by the United Nations.

They have commissioned the barrister Geoffrey Robertson and Mark Stephens, a solicitor, to present a justification for legal action.  - timesonline.com

It is shocking how Catholics put the interest of one man, the Pope, above the interests of thousands of children who have been molested and silenced by the machine of the church.  For those of us observing from outside the box, we think what their version of god must think of this scandal and cover up at the highest level.  It certainly seems that Catholics value the personage of the Pope more than they value justice and moral consistency.  The right thing to do in this case is to vote with your feet.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Pope Opera
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Tea Party

Mr. Deity pulls out all the stops by poking fun at the absurdity of eating the real flesh of blood of a dead god.

The New York Times broke news this week that Pope Benedict (formerly Cardinal Ratzinger) played a heavy hand in dismissing a Wisconsin case against a priest who had raped over 200 deaf boys at the religious school where he ministered. The American priest Rev. Lawrence C. Murphy worked at a school for the deaf in Wisconsin from 1950-1974. During that time he raped and sexually mollested over 200 students. The Catholic Priesthood is breeding grounds for child rape. First, the priesthood attracts gay men because it is offered as the only viable vocation for a gay Catholic teenage boy. Studying in the seminary, living with other gay men does not help their situation either. Secondly, the Catholic Church requires all their followers (but especially priests and nuns) to refrain completely from masturbation. This unnatural request leads to a sexual build up that is truly unhealthy when trying to live a life without the opportunity for sexual release. Sexual release is a natural need of the human body. Wet dreams are the body's way of satisfying this need if it is not dutifully taken care of. Thirdly, when you combine homophobia and this unhealthy view of masturbation and sex with settings where priests are in unsupervised contact with young naive children (who are not taught about sex and masturbation) you end up with a lethal cocktail of child rape.

Ten years ago in America, the Catholic Church was hit with multiple scandals of child rape by Ordained Priests. Recently the Dutch have had the beginnings of their own version of this, followed by Brazil and the rest of Europe seems to be following fast on their heels.  The New York Times broke news this week that Pope Benedict (formerly Cardinal Ratzinger) played a heavy hand in dismissing a Wisconsin case against a priest who had raped over 200 deaf boys at the religious school where he ministered.

The American priest Rev. Lawrence C. Murphy worked at a school for the deaf in Wisconsin from 1950-1974.  During that time he raped and sexually mollested over 200 students. The Catholic Church was slow to consider repremand for Rev. Murphy and began proceedings to investigate Murphy only after threats of a public lawsuit from a victim hit the Vatican.  Proceedings for a secret canonical trial began and Murphy was liable to be defrocked.  Murphy wrote a pleading letter to Cardinal Ratzinger begging not to be dismissed saying that he was old and had repented of his “sins”.  There is no record of a response from Ratzinger, but the trial was immediate suspended after Murphy wrote this letter to Ratzinger.

Instead of being disciplined, Father Murphy was quietly moved by Archbishop William E. Cousins of Milwaukee to the Diocese of Superior in northern Wisconsin in 1974, where he spent his last 24 years working freely with children in parishes, schools and, as one lawsuit charges, a juvenile detention center. He died in 1998, still a priest. – NYTimes

Ratzinger’s role in dismissing and moving around Murphy is disturbing at best.  Even more shocking is the mentality that if a man who rapes over 200 deaf boys simply confesses his “sins” to an mythical god, this is enough to let him slip by without consequence.  The Catholic Confessional stands as the proverbial slate washer that apparently dismisses ordained priests from facing the consequences of ruining so many young lives.

The Catholic Priesthood is breeding grounds for child rape.  First, the priesthood attracts gay men because it is offered as the only viable vocation for a gay Catholic teenage boy.  Studying in the seminary, living with other gay men does not help their situation either.  Secondly, the Catholic Church requires all their followers (but especially priests and nuns) to refrain completely from masturbation.(1)  This unnatural request leads to a sexual build up that is truly unhealthy when trying to live a life without the opportunity for sexual release.  Sexual release through masturbation or sexual intercourse is a natural need of the human body.  Wet dreams are the body’s way of satisfying this need if it is not dutifully taken care of.  Thirdly, when you combine homophobia and this unhealthy view of masturbation and sex with settings where priests are in unsupervised contact with young naive children (who are not taught about sex and masturbation) you end up with a lethal cocktail of child rape.

——————————–

1. From the Catechism of the Catholic Church: #2352 By masturbation is to be understood the deliberate stimulation of the genital organs in order to derive sexual pleasure. “Both the Magisterium of the Church, in the course of a constant tradition, and the moral sense of the faithful have been in no doubt and have firmly maintained that masturbation is an intrinsically and gravely disordered action.”137 “The deliberate use of the sexual faculty, for whatever reason, outside of marriage is essentially contrary to its purpose.” For here sexual pleasure is sought outside of “the sexual relationship which is demanded by the moral order and in which the total meaning of mutual self-giving and human procreation in the context of true love is achieved.”

Other sources: Slate The Great Catholic Cover-up

Letter to A Christian Nation was the first of Sam Harris' books that I picked up. Gathering assumptions from the title, I anticipated a book geared towards the religious infiltration into American politics. I found a bit of that mixed into Sam's book, but even better I found his straightforward approach to tackling American fundamentalists brilliantly refreshing. Written in the first person,[amazon ASIN="978-0307278777"]Letter to a Christian Nation[/amazon] bluntly points out the hypocracies American fundamentalist Christians show in opposing Muslim fundamentalists. Before doing this, he compactly brings down every major dogma of Christianity, laying the ground work for the final punch at the end. He rightly suggests that in order to combat the religious nonsense that drives Muslim suicide attacks, American Christians need to turn that finger around and examine their own radical, exclusive belief system.

Letter to A Christian Nation was the first of Sam Harris‘ books that I picked up.  Gathering assumptions from the title, I anticipated a book geared towards the religious infiltration into American politics.  I found a bit of that mixed into Sam’s book, but even better I found his straightforward approach to tackling American fundamentalists brilliantly refreshing.  Written in the first person, Letter to a Christian Nation bluntly points out the hypocrisies American fundamentalist Christians show in opposing Muslim fundamentalists.  Before doing this, he compactly brings down every major dogma of Christianity, laying the ground work for the final punch at the end.  He rightly suggests that in order to combat the religious nonsense that drives Muslim suicide attacks, American Christians need to turn that finger around and examine their own radical, exclusive belief system.

The entire read took me 2 hours.  Afterward I said aloud: “Yes, I absolutely agree.”  After sitting in contemplation for a moment I decided that it had been the best use of 2 hours in a long time to be enriched with the viewpoint Harris’ offered.  It is one of those books you feel like handing out to a fundy in your family who thinks their religion is the end-all, be-all and everyone else can go suck it.  It is almost as satisfying as knocking someone so pig-headed like that over the head with a board and shouting: “wake up you idiot! you do nothing but isolate yourself from reality!”  Intellectually satisfying.

Get a Letter to a Christian Nation or read Sam Harris’ other best seller: The End of Faith.

Another brilliant article by Christopher Hitchens.  This one deals with the outdated and very useless 10 commandments of the Judeo Christian religions.  He brings up many fabulous observations about how the bible actually has four versions of the 10 commandments within the Old Testament and how the first 4 commandments have nothing to do with how to behave but rather demand that its followers grovel before their god. Here is an excerpt from his Vanity Fair Article:

“There is in fact a good biblical precedent for doing just that, since the giving of the divine Law by Moses appears in three or four wildly different scriptural versions. (When you hear people demanding that the Ten Commandments be displayed in courtrooms and schoolrooms, always be sure to ask which set. It works every time.) The first and most famous set comes in Exodus 20 but ends with Moses himself smashing the supposedly most sacred artifacts ever known to man: the original, God-dictated panels of Holy Writ. The second edition occurs in Exodus 34, where new but completely different tablets are presented after some heavenly re-write session and are for the first time called “the ten commandments.” In the fifth chapter of Deuteronomy, Moses once more calls his audience together and recites the original Sinai speech with one highly significant alteration (the Sabbath commandment’s justifications in each differ greatly). But plainly discontented with the effect of this, he musters the flock again 22 chapters further on, as the river Jordan is coming into view, and gives an additional set of orders—chiefly terse curses—which are also to be inscribed in stone. As with the gold plates on which Joseph Smith found the Book of Mormon in upstate New York, no trace of any of these original yet conflicting tablets survives.” – Christopher Hitchens

Continue Reading the Full Article “The New Commandments”

Audio taken from a Q&A of Richard Dawkins.

1. GIVE IT UP. Every Lent it never fails: my Facebook news feed is loaded with Christian acquaintances posting what superfluous toy or food they have decided to deprive themselves of for 40 days. I vaguely recall a passage in the gospels where Jesus rebukes the Pharisees for publicly displaying their fasting and how god will not "count" it on the list he is supposedly making and checking (twice). You poor martyrs! How terrible that you have to do without soda, candy, chocolate, video games, TV, etc for a WHOLE FORTY DAYS. Have you given any thought as to all those who live in abject poverty and NEVER have ANY of that stuff? How arrogant of you to think that your god will reward you for giving up such luxuries when so many starve to death every day because they have nothing to eat? Four years ago I gave up eating all processed sugars, sodas, fast food and excess. I have never owned a video game and have not owned a TV for 3 years. I do this because it benefits my health and encourages exploration of the world. I fail to see how you giving up candy for Lent and complaining about it does anything to benefit you or those who go without every day of their lives. For Lent, try giving up God and see how clear things become. 2. FISH. If you have ever cooked a meal for Christians on a Friday in Lent, you know about how they "deprive" themselves on Fridays in Lent (only 4-5 Fridays in the year) and make a big deal to make sure everyone knows they can't "eat meat". The last time I checked, fish was meat. This whole fish on Fridays tradition has an interesting metamorphoses through history. Fasting rules for Catholics in particular used to be very strict. It progressed from no meat allowed on EVERY Friday of the year to only Wednesday and Fridays during Lent and then lastly to "no meat" on only Fridays during Lent. Then, as people tend to do, the faithful found a loophole in their rules because they did not "count" fish as meat by saying that it came from water animals, not land animals. After decades of their flock bending the rules so they could have fish on Fridays, the Catholic Church under Pope Paul VI decided to allow Fish on Fridays in 1966. Now, I don't mind accommodating my vegan friends, people with allergies or intolerance to certain foods. What does bother me is the "poor me" message that "fasting" Christians bring to my dinner table and to the world. McDonald's even caters to their "fast" season, commercializing and capitalizing on the pointless tradition of one religion. I fail to see how eating expensive fish, now in short supply is a sacrifice. Another problem with Christians eating Fish on Fridays is overfishing and how much Christianity has helped to decimate global fish populations.1 Fish is an expensive, rare meat on our over-fished planet. Christians are happy to help themselves to the almost extinct Tuna and Salmon in the name of their religious "fasting". Eating a delicacy is a far cry from depriving one's self in the name of Jesus. I also fail to see how encouraging people to consume fish during Lent is an example of good stewardship of the earth. 3. OBESITY. The thin priest will talk about it, but the fat ones won't touch the subject. Gluttony, one of the 'seven deadly sins', plagues a large swath of the faithful across all Christian divides. They sit in their pews and hear about how they should give in charity, deny themselves pleasures. Yet they exit church each Sunday to find a doughnut at the community hall and fail to connect how eating 2 to 3 times the amount of calories needed to live each day equates to starving children dying in third world countries. Even here on American soil, families are finding it difficult to find enough food to survive and the pious obese flock to church every Sunday to be reassured by their pastor that they are checking off all the necessary dates to be admitted into heaven. This type of hypocrisy abounds during Lent when the biblical reading encourage homilies about abstinence, moderation, charity and self denial. Obesity is perhaps the most un-Christian behavior of all, exercising gluttony, sloth, greed, addiction, destruction of your "god-given" body and a complete lack of compassion for those who have no food to eat. I fail to see how being 200 pounds overweight exemplifies Christian behavior. 4. TRADITION. If you ask a Christian why they celebrate Lent, the common response is because Jesus went into the desert for 40 days. There he supposedly ate no food and was tempted by the Devil. The irony in this is that to remember this improbable story, Christians "deprive" themselves of American comforts and "fast" on Fridays, even though they found the loophole of eating meat. It is almost as meaningless as reenacting the cannibalism of eating the flesh and blood of Jesus with wafers and cheap wine. Oh wait... they already do that. 5. HISTORY. Let's put the record straight. There are rumors out there that Pope Paul IV had monetary interest in seeing a budding new fishing industry succeed. It is not improbable, but still devoid of sources. Pope Paul IV was rumored to have had a mistress who's husband owned a fishing fleet. What is known about Pope Paul IV was his strong Antisemitism and his major role during the Inquisition. In 1555 he issued canon law forcing Jews to live separate from Christians, which created the Roman Ghetto. He strengthened and reorganized the Inquisition and believed that outside of Catholicism there was no salvation. He also had fig leaves painted over the nudes in the Sistine Chapel. 2, 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REFERENCES 1. The Pope and the Price of Fish, Full article 2. Pope Paul IV, Biography 3. NNDB

1.  GIVE IT UP. Every Lent it never fails: my Facebook news feed is loaded with Christian acquaintances posting what superfluous toy or food they have decided to deprive themselves of for 40 days.  I vaguely recall a passage in the gospels where Jesus rebukes the Pharisees for publicly displaying their fasting and how god will not “count” it on the list he is supposedly making and checking (twice).  You poor martyrs!  How terrible that you have to do without soda, candy, chocolate, video games, TV, etc for a WHOLE FORTY DAYS.  Have you given any thought as to all those who live in abject poverty and NEVER have ANY of that stuff?  How arrogant of you to think that your god will reward you for giving up such luxuries when so many starve to death every day because they have nothing to eat?  Four years ago I gave up eating all processed sugars, sodas, fast food and excess.  I have never owned a video game and have not owned a TV for 3 years.  I do this because it benefits my health and encourages exploration of the world.  I fail to see how you giving up candy for Lent and complaining about it does anything to benefit you or those who go without every day of their lives.  For Lent, try giving up God and see how clear things become.

2. FISH. If you have ever cooked a meal for Christians on a Friday in Lent, you know about how they “deprive” themselves on Fridays in Lent (only 4-5 Fridays in the year) and make a big deal to make sure everyone knows they can’t “eat meat”.  The last time I checked, fish was meat.  This whole fish on Fridays tradition has an interesting metamorphoses through history.  Fasting rules for Catholics in particular used to be very strict.  It progressed from no meat allowed on EVERY Friday of the year to only Wednesday and Fridays during Lent and then lastly to “no meat” on only Fridays during Lent.  Then, as people tend to do, the faithful found a loophole in their rules because they did not “count” fish as meat by saying that it came from water animals, not land animals.  After decades of their flock bending the rules so they could have fish on Fridays, the Catholic Church under Pope Paul VI decided to allow Fish on Fridays in 1966.  Now, I don’t mind accommodating my vegan friends, people with allergies or intolerance to certain foods.  What does bother me is the “poor me” message that “fasting” Christians bring to my dinner table and to the world.    McDonald’s even caters to their “fast” season, commercializing and capitalizing on the pointless tradition of one religion.  I fail to see how eating expensive fish, now in short supply is a sacrifice.

Another problem with Christians eating Fish on Fridays is overfishing and how much Christianity has helped to decimate global fish populations.1 Fish is an expensive, rare meat on our over-fished planet.  Christians are happy to help themselves to the almost extinct Tuna and Salmon in the name of their religious “fasting”.  Eating a delicacy is a far cry from depriving one’s self in the name of Jesus. I also fail to see how encouraging people to consume fish during Lent is an example of good stewardship of the earth.

3. OBESITY. The thin priest will talk about it, but the fat ones won’t touch the subject.  Gluttony, one of the ‘seven deadly sins’, plagues a large swath of the faithful across all Christian divides.  They sit in their pews and hear about how they should give in charity, deny themselves pleasures.  Yet they exit church each Sunday to find a doughnut at the community hall and fail to connect how eating 2 to 3 times the amount of calories needed to live each day equates to starving children dying in third world countries.  Even here on American soil, families are finding it difficult to find enough food to survive and the pious obese flock to church every Sunday to be reassured by their pastor that they are checking off all the necessary dates to be admitted into heaven.  This type of hypocrisy abounds during Lent when the biblical reading encourage homilies about abstinence, moderation, charity and self denial.  Obesity is perhaps the most un-Christian behavior of all, exercising gluttony, sloth, greed, addiction, destruction of your “god-given” body and a complete lack of compassion for those who have no food to eat.  I fail to see how being 200 pounds overweight exemplifies Christian behavior.

4. TRADITION. If you ask a Christian why they celebrate Lent, the common response is because Jesus went into the desert for 40 days.  There he supposedly ate no food and was tempted by the Devil.  The irony in this is that to remember this improbable story, Christians “deprive” themselves of American comforts and “fast” on Fridays, even though they found the loophole of eating meat.  It is almost as meaningless as reenacting the cannibalism of eating the flesh and blood of Jesus with wafers and cheap wine.  Oh wait… they already do that.

5. HISTORY. Let’s put the record straight.  There are rumors out there that Pope Paul IV had monetary interest in seeing a budding new fishing industry succeed.  It is not improbable, but still devoid of sources.  Pope Paul IV was rumored to have had a mistress who’s husband owned a fishing fleet.  What is known about Pope Paul IV was his strong Antisemitism and his major role during the Inquisition.   In 1555 he issued canon law forcing Jews to live separate from Christians, which created the Roman Ghetto.  He strengthened and reorganized the Inquisition and believed that outside of Catholicism there was no salvation.   He also had fig leaves painted over the nudes in the Sistine Chapel. 2, 3

———————————————————————————

REFERENCES

1. The Pope and the Price of Fish, Full article

2. Pope Paul IV, Biography

3. NNDB

Where do you think this quote comes from? "He who will not eat of my body and drink of my blood, so that he will be made one with me and I with him, the same shall not know salvation" Sounds like it came from John's gospel and indeed, John did say something very similar when he put these word's into Jesus' mouth: "Unless you eat of the flesh of the son of Man and drink his blood, you have not life in yourselves. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood will live in me and I in him" The first quote is from the Mysteries of Mithra, a deity who was worshiped hundreds of years before the gospel writers. Mithra's popularity as a deity grew alongside Christianity, with it's high point occurring in the 3rd Century AD. Mithra's narrative parallels that of Jesus with striking similarity. Get information on the Documentary at TheGodMovie.com

Sam Harris, author of[amazon ASIN="978-0393327656"]The End of Faith[/amazon] and[amazon ASIN="978-0307278777"]Letter to a Christian Nation,[/amazon] narrates this definative documentary on how Christianity is in no way a unique religious story.  “The God Who was Not There” details the inconsistancies in the Bible’s A new perspective about the Apostle Paul reveals that Paul never mentions any of the Jesus story written in the four gospels.  Paul speaks of Jesus as an idea, not as an actual human being with the narrative in the Gospel writings.

Where do you think this quote comes from? “He who will not eat of my body and drink of my blood, so that he will be made one with me and I with him, the same shall not know salvation” Sounds like it came from John’s gospel and indeed, John did say something very similar when he put these word’s into Jesus’ mouth: “Unless you eat of the flesh of the son of Man and drink his blood, you have not life in yourselves. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood will live in me and I in him” The first quote is from the Mysteries of Mithra, a deity who was worshiped hundreds of years before the gospel writers.  Mithra’s popularity as a deity grew alongside Christianity, with it’s high point occurring in the 3rd Century AD.  Mithra’s narrative parallels that of Jesus with striking similarity.

Get information on the Documentary at TheGodMovie.com

Daniel C. Dennett frequently contributes to NewsWeek but this recent article caught my attention.  Mr. Dennett, renown atheist, philospher and best selling author tackled the subject of religious taboos in American culture. The following is a quote from Dennett’s article titled ‘Religious No Longer A Protected Class’:

“Q: Is there widespread media bias against Christianity? Against evangelicals such as Brit Hume and Sarah Palin? Against public figures who speak openly and directly about their faith? Against people who believe as you do?

There is no media bias against Christianity. If it appears to some people that there is, it is probably because after decades of hyper-diplomacy and a generally accepted mutual understanding that religion was not to be criticized, we have finally begun breaking through that taboo and are beginning to see candid discussions of the varieties of religious folly in American life. Activities that would be condemned by all if they were not cloaked in the protective mantle of religion are beginning to be subjected to proper scrutiny.

There is still a lot to accomplish however. We need to change the prevailing assumptions in the same way that public opinion has been reversed on drunk driving. When I was young, drunk drivers tended to be excused because, after all, they were drunk! Today, happily, we hold them doubly culpable for any misdeeds they commit while under the influence.

I look forward to the day when violence done under the influence of religious passion is considered more dishonorable, more shameful, than crimes of avarice, and is punished accordingly, and religious leaders who incite such acts are regarded with the same contempt that we reserve for bartenders who send dangerously disabled people out onto the highways.

I also look forward to the day when pastors who abuse the authority of their pulpits by misinforming their congregations about science, about public health, about global warming, about evolution must answer to the charge of dishonesty. Telling pious lies to trusting children is a form of abuse, plain and simple. If quacks and bunko artists can be convicted of fraud for selling worthless cures, why not clergy for making their living off unsupported claims of miracle cures and the efficacy of prayer?

The double standard that exempts religious activities from almost all standards of accountability should be dismantled once and for all. I don’t see bankers or stockbrokers wringing their hands because the media is biased against them; they know that their recent activities have earned them an unwanted place in the spotlight of public attention and criticism, and they get no free pass, especially given their power. Religious leaders and apologists should accept that since their institutions are so influential in American life, we have the right to hold their every move up to the light. If they detect that the media are giving them a harder time today than in the past, that is because the bias that protected religion from scrutiny is beginning to dissolve. High time.” - Daniel C. Dennett

Sam Harris, author of [amazon ASIN="978-0393327656"]The End of Faith[/amazon] and[amazon ASIN="978-0307278777"]Letters to a Christian Nation[/amazon],  explains how Human morality is best explained by science and not by religions.  Listen to his interview on California public radio.

From ProudAtheist, find out what the “Pear of Anguish” was used for.

Dawkins has covered this in his book [amazon ASIN="978-0618918249"]The God Delusion[/amazon], but this 10 year study has concurred that the more religious a region is, the higher its social ills and immoral behaviors will be.

Behavioral scientists have provided a window into how religion resides in the human brain.  A study published in in the Nov. 30 early edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences discusses how people infer their own opinions and judgments onto their “god”, using their own moral instincts to conclude that the imaginary being they worship must think similarly. From Science Daily:

The final study involved functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure the neural activity of test subjects as they reasoned about their own beliefs versus those of God or another person. The data demonstrated that reasoning about God’s beliefs activated many of the same regions that become active when people reasoned about their own beliefs.

The researchers noted that people often set their moral compasses according to what they presume to be God’s standards. “The central feature of a compass, however, is that it points north no matter what direction a person is facing,” they conclude. “This research suggests that, unlike an actual compass, inferences about God’s beliefs may instead point people further in whatever direction they are already facing.”

Read more at Science Daily

Remember how worked up Glenn Beck and the Fox News network stars like Bill O’Reilly were when the tapes of ACORN workers giving prostitution advice on hidden camera came out?  And recall how angry O’Reilly gets when he interviews atheist spokesman Richard Dawkins, furious that a person could be so against organized religion.  Then we have Mormon follower Glenn Beck who advocates a religious fanaticism towards “God and Country”.

These guys love juicy stories with dirt and a cover up story.  Well, here’s one that seems to have slipped under their selective hearing.  The Catholic Church is a mulit million dollar supporter of ACORN.

“While Obama has strong ties to ACORN, they were originally established through the U.S. Catholic Church, which has also funded ACORN and similar organizations to the tune of millions of dollars. This is another taboo topic for most of the media.  Even conservative news organizations are afraid of raising the issue, apparently fearing being tagged with the “anti-Catholic” label.”  From AIM

Did someone say “separation of church and state”?  Oh, right I forgot that the religious only like to bring that up when the state tries to influence and meddle in religious affairs, not visa versa.   When it comes to influencing the state, the Catholic Church wears the schoolyard bully shoes with a smerk.

Today the Washington Post reported that the Catholic Church has threatened that it will not continue offering social service programs in DC if the state passes a same-sex marriage law.  Here we go with the Catholic Church, always obsessed with SEX.  They sound more obessed with SEX these days than a 12 year old boy!  Abstiance only education, celebacy and the Fr. Cutie sex scandal, lying to Africans saying that condoms increase one’s risk of HIV infection, covering up the rape and sexual child abuse of 5% of their clergy, and now they are insessantly trying to intefer with what goes on in the bedrooms of homosexual men and women!  Really?!  Can we drop the sex obsession already, Catholic Church?

Mr. Deity hashes out the confusion with Jesus:

As an atheist, I have heard every kind of illogical argument from the emotional to the ones with unfounded premises. This video is a great summation of how logic refutes superstitious claims.

Schaeffer: “A village cannot reorganize village life to suit the village idiot. We have to understand we have a village idiot in this country and it is called Fundamentalist Christianity.” He goes on to say that the Republican party is the party that caters to the village idiot and the extreme subculture of Fundamentalist Christianity.

Jeff Sharlet has the balls to unearth the dirty secrets of a Christian Mafia in his book "The FamilyThe Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power." This wealthy group was established during the great depression with the idology that power and wealth were bestowed by the christian god and should be things to be sought after. The Family openly admires Hitler, Stalin and Mau as men who understood how to attain and wield the type of power they seek to attain. The Family acts as a lobby group (unregistered) and claims non profit status as a religious organization. They also house prominent members of government in a sort of exclusive resort house call the "C Street House" where the officials are waited on hand and foot and served meals by college girls of the local Catholic College. Some of these men who are part of The Family who have recently been in the news for extramarital affairs have been Senator John Ensign and South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford, The Family regularily pays for countless statesmen and government officials to travel overseas to befriend third-world dictators and oppressive regimes. It is the philosophy of The Family that these dictators have god given power and deserve to be included in the christian mafia in an attempt to unite powerful, rich men all over the world with the goal of influencing public policy on a global scale.

Jeff Sharlet has the balls to unearth the dirty secrets of a Christian Mafia in his book “The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power.” This wealthy group was established during the great depression with the ideology that power and wealth were bestowed by the christian god and should be things to be sought after. The Family openly admires Hitler, Stalin and Mau as men who understood how to attain and wield the type of power they seek to attain. The Family acts as a lobby group (unregistered) and claims non profit status as a religious organization. They also house prominent members of government in a sort of exclusive resort house call the “C Street House” where the officials are waited on hand and foot and served meals by college girls of the local Catholic College. Some of these men who are part of The Family who have recently been in the news for extramarital affairs have been Senator John Ensign and South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford,

The Family regularly pays for a select group of statesmen and government officials to travel overseas to befriend third-world dictators and oppressive regimes.  It is the philosophy of The Family that these dictators have god given power and deserve to be included in the christian mafia in an attempt to unite powerful, rich men all over the world with the goal of influencing public policy on a global scale.

Sharlet’s book exposes this wicked group in an in-depth manner that draws ties to a large number of elected government officials including President Ford, George W. Bush and Ronald Regan.

Sharlet recently interviewed on Jon Stewart’s Daily show (clip below).  Even better is his interview on NPR

LISTEN to the NPR interview HERE

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Jeff Sharlet
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Spinal Tap Performance

I hesitated to post this for many months because it made the human race so deplorable (similarly to what Gulliver in Gulliver’s travels felt like after living with the Whinnem). But here it is. Knowledge is power. Just don’t get to down on humanity and do something uplifting after you watch it. Volunteer or donate to a charity to cheer yourself up :)

ZeitGeist, full movie

And take it all with a pinch of salt… use your critical thinking skills.

PZ Myers has been covering this in great detail, but here is a little video made by some skeptics as they toured Ken Ham’s Creation “Museum” in Kentucky.



I hesitated to share this because it was so blatently bias and unscientific that it made my stomach turn. At EveryStudent.com people can read about a proof for god that is highly prefaced with a disclaimer. The disclaimer starts by saying that the proof for god offered at their website will only be worth something if the reader has an open mind.  Fair enough.  Skeptics like myself are far from close minded, we just demand extraordinary evidence for extraordinary claims. The disclaimer continues:

If a person opposes even the possibility of there being a God, then any evidence can be rationalized or explained away. It is like if someone refuses to believe that people have walked on the moon, then no amount of information is going to change their thinking. Photographs of astronauts walking on the moon, interviews with the astronauts, moon rocks…all the evidence would be worthless, because the person has already concluded that people cannot go to the moon.

Their use of this analogy floored me.  It is almost too easy to start shredding this argument.  If someone had a photograph of god, taped interview with god, pieces of god’s skin under a microscope, I would be hard pressed not to believe that evidence.  However, when people say that god is real and is the biggest most powerful force in the natural world, they need to come up with some pretty amazing evidence to support that claim.  Only conspirator theorists and nut jobs don’t believe that the moon landing actually happened.  More recently, spacecraft flying over the moon’s surface have photographed the lunar landing site complete with footprints and spacejunk left behind.

Yeah, if someone had credible video of Santa Clause flying his reindeer through the winter’s sky, I’ll believe in him.

Treaty between the United States and Tripoli in 1796.

Art. 11. As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

Last March we  heard about a Brazilian child who after being raped by her stepfather conceived twins at the age of 9 years oldObviously she and her family decided to abort the babies considering her age and the danger of childbirth at such a young age, (and the circumstance of rape).  Because of this decision, the Catholic church responded by excommunicating the child, her mother and the doctors who conducted the procedure.

Abortion is illegal in Brazil except in cases of rape or when the mother’s life is in danger, both of which apply in this case. (The girl’s immature hips would have made labor dangerous; the Catholic opinion was that she could have had a cesarean section.) (via Time.com)

So much for a compassionate religious group.  After living through the trama of being raped by her stepfather, this religious institution expected this young girl to live through childbirth and becoming a mother at a point in her life where she has not even reached the AGE OF REASON.  As a naturalist, it matters not to me whether one is “in the catholic club” or not.  However, this sort of behaviour demonstrates how out of touch and desperate these magistrates and robe-wearing celibates are with the rest of the world.  Now, considering that Brazil is the most Catholic nation in the world, this brash move does not come as a surprise.   Recently Brazil’s population has declined from almost 100% Catholic to 74% catholic.  This encouraging statistic may have church officials on edge and more willing to “pull out all the stops” when trying to make their religion appear serious and legitimate.

I say we let the catholic leaders continue to don their colorful robes, pointy hats and golden staffs.   Let them throw people out of their club and offer pretend blood sacrifices like in the bronze age.  Let them dig their own graves.  Every superstition fads from fame.  Moon worship, Sun worship, Zeus… Jezeus is next.

Arizona State Senator Sylvia Allen thinks the earth is 6,000 years old.  Why do we not have an IQ test to serve as an elected official?

From New Zealand another religious parent takes offense at their child’s independent mind and shows his anger with a concrete block to her head.

A 55-year-old man who beat his daughter over the head with a lump of concrete when she refused to go to his Mormon church “does not understand what all the fuss is about”, Hastings District Court has heard.

Uluia Muliipu appeared in court after pleading guilty to one count of assault with intent to injure.  via nzherald.com

It’s a miracle! All you Christians bow down and worship!. Or maybe the basilisk lizard is the anti-christ…. it is so confusing. :)

This series explores how fundamental Christianity is using the military as an active extention of their “mission” to make the USA a Christian nation.

The most disturbing thing I heard from this documentary was that Christian soldiers are convinced they are fighting in the middle east in the name of Christianity.  Also,  for active troops there is no alternative to religious gatherings.  Humanist or psycological support for the emotionally depraved soldiers are not provided or funded alongside the thousands of Chaplin.  So sad… they are preying on the emotionally vulnerable and the state is not providing alternatives to find support without the superstitions and myths attached.


This seemed to me like a fruition of what the movie “Jesus Camp” fosters.  If you haven’t seen, go find it.

echo laughter from PZmyers:

#3 is pretty far down on the list. Which explains why they can’t spell it correctly.

From a Georgian homeschool football league.

19 March 2009. World famous philosopher and humanist Daniel Dennett speaks at Conway Hall, providing “A Darwinian Perspective on Religions: Past, Present and Future”

This article in defense of god’s “omnipotence” was brought to my attention and I took note of how the author went through great lengths to stretch reason to the breaking point.  It was too irresistible to let it go unanswered from a skeptic, as the author deems it his mission to address the many flaws in “omnipotence” that skeptics have pointed out.

He shoots himself in the foot right from the start by admitting to assuming that a god exists and then assuming he knows the characteristics of said unproven being. But we will let him get away with it, or there would be no fun to be had.

The author goes on to set up a straw man argument against omnipotence by saying that skeptics say that god cannot be omnipotent because god is unable to create a scenario where he is unable to do something.  What he fails to address is some basic flaws in the definitions he offers of what his god is (both omnipotent and omniscient).

Omniscience is “all knowing” or “infinitely wise”. Omnipotence is “having unlimited power”.  “If God is omniscient, he must already know how he is going to intervene to change the course of history using his omnipotence. But that means he can’t change his mind about his intervention, which means he is not omnipotent.” – Richard Dawkins (The God Delusion)  The author of this article fails to address these irreconcilable characteristics of said god.
The author continues with an argument that the attributes of god are “simple” because he says “god is actual” and has an “unchanging nature”.  Basically he is stating that god is simple because he exists and does not change.  How we equate existence and static being to simplicity, is unclear.  What he means when he says “simple” is also unclear and the purpose in doing so is not explained.

Continuing on, he poses  another straw man argument by saying that skeptics point out that god cannot sin and therefore is not omnipotent because there is something he cannot do.  This guy suggests that god CAN sin, but he chooses not to do so.  Yet from there he goes on to state:

In fact, it is my belief that God’s omni-benevolence (God’s all-goodness) prevents him from sinning

He suggests here that god would probably sin if it were not for this omni- part of him that stops him from doing what might otherwise come naturally.  Which seems absurd to me.  Isn’t sin the act of offending god?  So wouldn’t it be impossible for god to sin against himself?  Self contracting reasoning here.

The author then poses this question when making his point about a god who chooses not to sin and then considers the alternative:

Could you imagine a “God” who stopped refraining from sinning and started raping, pillaging and destroying randomly? Certainly this is not the Christian God!

Well, I am glad you asked.  I don’t have to imagine that god.  People already worship him!  Let me introduce you to the Judeo-Christian god who in the Old Testament commands his followers to pillage, commit genocide, take more than one wife, and kill each other when Moses catches them dancing around the golden bull.  This god killed every first born child in Egypt and did not stop Jepthah from killing is only daughter as a sacrifice to god for his help in winning a genocide battle against a neighboring tribe.  The Christian god is a murderous, two faced mafia boss whose twisted ways are well documented in the bible.

And here I will let this author contradict himself again:

a skeptic might suggest that if the above definition is true then that still means that a human can steal candy from a baby but God cannot. Does this suggest that we have the power to do something that is impossible for God? Yes, in a sense this is true. We have one power that God does not: we can sin.

Next, the author tackles the problem of  evil.  He presents the skeptics’ argument:

P1. Evil exists in the world

P2. God is all-good and all-powerful and all-knowing

P3. An all-good, all-powerful, all-knowing God should only create a world of total goodness

C1. Yet P1 conflicts with P3 so we must conclude that an all-good, all-knowing, all-powerful God does not exist.

He suggests how to solve this logical argument by denying any one of the 3 premises.  He admits the difficulty in denying P1 and P2.  So he resorts to rejecting P3 with this justification:

God allows evil to exist so that the highest form of good can exist.

Essentially he is stating that the highest form of good is reliant upon the existence of evil.  Which logically makes evil more powerful than good.  Tell that to the child who was raped by his parish priest at the tender age of 9.  Tell that to the starving children in third world countries.  Tell that to the family of people murdered by the KKK.  Go ahead and tell them that this evil is good for them in the long haul.

Next, the author states:

evil is not a tangible thing; in a way evil is not a reality like goodness

He expounds on this fallacy by saying that evil is the absence of goodness and therefore goodness is a thing and evil is a non-thing.  This is a logical fallacy.  “Good” and “evil” are words humans use to describe events and behaviors.  Neither is a tangible thing and neither is the absense of the the other.   These terms can change what they describe as a society evolves and grows.  For example, slavery was a good thing in the bible and was condoned by god, but today we recognize slavery as an evil form of human repression.   These terms can also be applied to the same act with varying circumstances.  For example, the act of killing someone can be called both good or evil depending on the situation (aggression verses self defense).  Good and evil are not tangible things, rather they are words used to describe behavior and circumstances.

In a final hurrah, he attempts to dismiss all evil as originating from another mythological being called Satan.  So we have a “good creator” who is unproven who created Satan.  Satan (an unproven mythological scapegoat) choose to disobey the “good creator” and hence became powerful enough in his rejection to spark a whole bunch of other evils.

…the free choice of the devil to refuse submission to the divine will lead to a corruption and a dissolution of the natural powers of Satan’s will. In a metaphysical sense, the will of Satan was corrupted by his choice to disobey God. This was the beginning and origin of all evil: for the choice of Satan lead to a corruption within the very will of Satan.

He then goes into the mythology of angels and their ranks, powers and how they cannot be forgiven like humans, which is why the devil cannot repent and go back to heaven.  All unproven scapegoat ideas to excuse the problem of evil.  Make up some “evil force” character who takes the blame for all the stuff that we don’t want the “good force” taking credit for.

Finally, the author pulls out the big creation myth guns and says that all humanity must suffer the evils of this world because Adam and Eve sinned big time when the talking snake convinced them to eat forbidden fruit in god’s garden right after he created the world in 7 days.  Right.  So babies have to die horrible deaths from crippling diseases because some bloat 6,000 years ago couldn’t find another piece of fruit to snack on?

Either god is omnipotent or not. If he is, then the bad stuff that happens is part of his knowledge/plan. So the child who died last year at the hands of her religious mother because the parents wanted to pray away her diabedes instead of seek medical help was all part of god’s plan. And the starving children who die every day are part of the plan of the omnipotent god.

This author is essentially saying “God does the good stuff and nature (and Satan) does the bad stuff”. An omnipotent god controls EVERYTHING by definition, even the evil and suffering. So next time you hear of a priest raping a young child, make sure to thank god for it (because god has a “greater good” in store for that molested child and can justify letting a priest follow through with rape).

Khyra, the daughter of a Muslim convert family, has died of starvation at the hand of her mother in Britain.

Khyra was unconscious when paramedics, called to the house in the early hours of last Saturday morning, discovered her and her five brothers and sisters lying on mattresses in a bedroom. Allegedly severely emaciated, she was taken to hospital but died on the way. 1

Evidently the neighbor lady noticed that three of the five children would eat the bread crumbs she spread out in her yard for the birds.   Both parents have been arrested on child abuse and the investigation is looking into the religious practice of starvation as a form of exorsism.

Irish Catholic priest Fr. Gannon, a repeat child sex offender is on trial for sexually mollesting an 11 year old boy in the 1960s.  Gannon alledgedly assulted the boy 3 times, once in the rectory when the child appeared for  altar boy duties.  He told the youngster that he was giving him an anatomy lesson and not to tell anyone because no one would belive the boy.

Gannon has been previously convicted of sexual assult but only served time for one conviction.  Despite the many testimonies agaist him, Gannon refuses to apologize or show remorse for his destructive and offensive behavior.

And he fondled and kissed the boy in the pump room of the local swimming pool in 1969, the court heard.

Asked by police why he took the boy to the secluded bush location and touched his penis, Gannon replied he was explaining the “differences in anatomy”.

“I thought it was less formal rather than inviting him into the presbytery and that’s all,” he told police. 2

Fr. Gannon’s behavior suggests he does not fully understand the severity of his actions.  The submissive behavior fostered by the Catholic church provides pedofiles like Gannon a furtile playing field to wreak havoc on the lives of youngsters who are told to trust priests  and elders in their parent’s religious cult.

In the wake of the Daniel Hauser Minnesota case, news from Britain tells of a criminal convinction of parents Thomas and Manju Sam.  Attempting to treat their child’s chronic eczema.  The 9 month old baby died in 2002 and just recently have the court proceedings found the parents guilty of criminal negligence by continuing homeopathic treatments as their child’s condition worsened to the point of her skin weeping and pealing off when they changed her clothing.  Read the full report here.

Sam Harris explains:

A recent article in New Scientist gave us a glimpse into the family feud between Christian Creationists and Christian Evolutionists.  Not suprisingly, each side puts up a website designed to give credibility to their side of the story.

What tickles me pink is that both sides look indistinguishable from the standpoint of a scientist and atheist.  Ultimately, Creationists argue that “god created the universe as it appears today out of thin air” while their friends on the other side of the mud flinging fence say that “god created the circumstances for the known universe out of thin air.”  Ultimately, they are arguing for the same thing (that a magic man did it), while throwing spit balls at each other over where to place the magic man in the history of the universe.  It is no different than seeing a peach on the ground underneath a tree and agreeing with your friend that Zeus made that peach fall, while arguing with your friend over whether or not Zeus put it there on the ground or whether he put the peach tree there to make the peach to fall on the ground.

Let’s be fair to the Creationists though.  The reason they must defend the bible’s position that the earth is 6,000 years old and that humans are all decended from one man and one women is to defend their entire religion.  If the creation story is just a myth, a story, a nice little bedtime tale as the modern Christian believes, then what is the point of Jesus?  According to the bible, Adam and Eve sinned by eating an apple, thus making God upset.  God then sent himself in the form of Jesus to placate himself for that little Eden upset.  You may agree that even if the Eden/Creation story is true, that circular reasoning sounds like bullshit, however this is what 75% of Americans are told sounds reasonable.  So, to defend their religion, the Creationists are forced to argue against evolution in order to keep intact the entire POINT of their religious following.  That Jesus came to die because of what happened in the Creation/Eden story.

Being a outspoken Facebooker and Blogger, I get a fair amount of email.  This one shocked me because of the author’s uninformed disposition.  The name has been changed to protect identity.
Kara:
I’m sorry if I’m bringing up a touchy subject with you, but a mythical deity? How can you think or say that Jesus Christ is mythical? Just look all around you at everything and everyone, even your beautiful Arizona couldn’t have just appeared. Someone had to create it; and that was God. And this is the greatest weekend in the history of the Catholic Church, when we celebrate Jesus’ life, passion, death, and resurrection! How and why did this change in religion come about? Again, sorry if this is a touchy subject, but I’m very surprised. You were raised Catholic, attend a Catholic University.

What is Astrophysics? Never heard of it! Lol! Well, I hope everything works out for you. And I will keep you in my prayers!

Chrystine:
Thanks for opening up discussion. This is by no means a touchy subject and something that I am happy to talk about with others.

Having been indoctrinated with religion, I was given a chance to think for myself upon entering college and found that religion does not stand up to the microscope of logic and reasoning.

The universe and the small planet we call earth are all a result of the “big bang” and the aftermath of that. Life began on earth in the microbial stages billions of years ago and evolution has taken life to what it is today. Through technology we have been able to find over 1 billion galaxies in our universe. Each of those galaxies has aprox. 1 billion planets within it. Therefore, there is 1 billion billion planets (at least) in our known universe. If you say that the chance of an earthlike planet being formed is a 1 in a billion chance, you still have 1 billion earthlike planets that could have formed. The odds are rather high, even for a probability equation. None of this gives evidence to a sky-god.

You say “someone had to create it; and that was God”. Why did someone have to create it? Why is that the only option? Just because we do not understand something does not give us credence to shove a god into that crack of the unknown. Religion has operated in this sense for many years. we didn’t understand lighting so Zeus must be throwing it down. we didn’t understand rain, so God must be opening flood hatches to dump water on us. we didn’t understand the sun and moon so we worshiped them. the church was convinced the earth was flat, and then that the earth was the center of our solar system. Wherever science honestly says “we don’t know the answer, but we are looking for evidence of the correct answer” religion steps in and shoves god into that gap. That is otherwise known as “God of the Gaps”. I have yet to see provable, repeatable evidence for any type of god.

Kara:
Hmm… If you couldn’t guess already, I don’t agree with you in the least. The Catholic Church is my everything and I will do my very best to defend Her. From what you’ve wrote above, you have studied this and I have studied my Catholic Faith, but you’ll have to give me a little bit to gather my thoughts! :) But, in reaction to the “big band” theory you believe in, (I hope this doesn’t come across as sarcastic) but saying that the world just “became” or “came into exsistence” is like saying that a dictionary is the product of an explosion in a printing factory. The Book of Genesis, says it all. It takes you through day by day of how God created the universe. Now all of the information you gave above of the billions of galaxies seem to be information from within the big bang theory and therefore, I don’t believe it. As for evolution, do you believe that we evolved from apes? Because if you do… why are there still apes on this planet? Adam, the first human being, did not just come to be. God created him from the dust of the earth. That is why on Ash Wednesday, at the beginning of Lent, we have ashes placed on our foreheads and the words “Remember you are dust and to dust you shall return” are said. God then created Eve, from Adam’s rib. From Adam and Eve came the rest of the human race. There are some things that we need to just believe and not always have an exact reason or logic for. Again, in the Bible Jesus Christ said: “Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believed.” The supernatural things throughout the Catholic Faith, for instance: The Eucharist, Heaven, Purgatory, Hell, Christ’s Resurrection and Ascension into Heaven are things that a human cannot wrap their mind around and will go absolutely crazy trying to figure out. This is where God, Jesus Christ, and the Catholic Church come into play. Seminarians, Theologians, Priests, Deacons, Bishops, Cardinals, and Popes have studied this and questions like these for centuries and the only way any of this world can be true is if someone supernatural created it. Which brings me to the question: “Where do you believe that people go after they die?” We don’t just cease to exsist. Depending on the way we live out life, we will go to Heaven and spend eternity with Our Almighty Father, Jesus Christ, the Blessed Virgin Mary, and all the saint and angels, or we will go to Hell and burn in fire with the devil and his followers. And yet there is hope for those who die with sin still on their soul. These people go to Purgatory and are purified from their sin and then will be taken to Heaven. Those are my thoughts and belief’s. I have many more but I don’t think Facebook has the capacity to hold them all! :)

Chrystine:
The bible says the earth is 6,000 years old. Science and evidence through carbon dating and zirconium dating have dated the earth to be 4.5 billion years old. Astrophysics has established that it has been 13.7 billion earth years since the big bang. all these numbers are supported by evidence, repeatable math equations, fossil records and physics. arguing against it is the modern equivalent of saying the earth is flat.

Humans did not evolve from apes. do some research on this from non religious science sources. Humans, Neanderthals and apes and chimps evolved from previous lines of now extinct ape like ancestors. That humans somehow evolved from monkeys is the uneducated reply to evolution.

You claim god created the universe. Prove it. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

What is your proof that something happens to humans after death? Humans have created the allusion of eternal life because death scares us. Our brains do not know what it is like to not exist. However I did not exist for billions of years before I was born and I imagine I will be just fine not existing for billions of years after I die. There will be no “me” to be sad or concerned about it either.

How Evolution works: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpNeGuuuvTY

Kara:
Well, for my point of veiw this hasn’t really been “fun”, because I’m worried about your soul. I’m glad you enjoyed it though. Again, I must say I’m extremely shocked at your change of religious beliefs. God bless you Christine and I will pray for you. AND I will also come up with form of proof for you in the future! :) And then we shall continue this discussion! Talk to you later!

Chrystine:
If you can prove that I have a soul, I will let you be worried about it. :) Please do not pray for me, as it is a true waste of time and will amount to nothing. Instead, educate yourself and branch out from your comfort zone. It is refreshing outside the box. I look forward to your proofs, though I must warn you I haven’t found one yet that has held up to logic. Let me leave you with this little gem:

In The God Delusion, Dawkins discusses evolutionary by products. The example he chooses to use is a moth flying into a flame as a demonstration of what we see as abject stupidity. Why would a moth deliberately fly into a flame?

This is not an example of natural selection….it is an example of natural selection gone wrong. Moths evolved to fly at night by using celestial objects as guides: Keep the light source in a certain position and you can navigate, much as we do with a compass which points north. Dawkins notes that it was not until comparatively late in evolutionary history that there was anything like artificial lights to throw off the moths. We see only the moths who get distracted by the flames. We do not see millions of moths who merrily go on their way without self-immolating themselves.

So, what is the Darwinian answer to religion? Dawkins sees it this way.

“My specific hypothesis is about children. More than any other species we survive by the accumulated experience of previous generations and that experience needs to be passed on to children for their protection and well-being. Theoretically, children might learn from personal experience not to go too near a cliff-edge, not to eat untried red berries, not to swim in crocodile-infested waters. But, to say the least, there will be a selective advantage to child brains that possess the rule of thumb: believe, without question, whatever your grown-ups tell you. Obey your parents; obey the tribal elders, especially when they adopt a solemn, minatory tone. Trust your elders without question. This is a generally valuable rule for a child. But, as with the moths, it can go wrong.”

Dawkins then continues:

“Natural selection builds child brains with a tendency to believe whatever their parents and tribal elders tell them. Such trusting obedience is valuable for survival: the analogue of steering by the moon for a moth. But the flip side of trusting obedience is slavish gullibility. The inevitable by-produce is vulnerability to infection by mind viruses. For excellent reasons related to Darwinian survival, child brains need to trust parents and elders whom parents tell them to trust. An automatic consequence is that the truster has no way of distinguishing good advice from bad. The child cannot know that “Don’t paddle in the crocodile-infested Limpopo” is good advice but “You must sacrifice a goat at the time of the full moon, otherwise the rains will fail” is at best a waste of time and goats. Both admonitions sound equally trustworthy. Both come from a respected source and are delivered with a solemn earnestness that commands respect and demands obedience.”

The Jesuit maxim “Give me the child until he is seven and I will give you the man” clearly understand the net result of this principle.

It should not surprise you that abortion rights extremists are praising the murder of abortion clinic doctor George Tiller this week.   Dr. Tiller was shot and killed while he was serving as an usher at his home church in Kansas.  The killer was motivated to shoot Tiller on account of his day job.

Pro-life advocates are now publicly lauding the actions of Tiller’s killer because they claim that the murder was justified.   This should not come as a shock to the non-religious, as the typical pro-lifer is Christian and a follower of the bronze age book of morals, the bible.  The bible has an interesting story in Judges 11 where a man named Jephthah asks his god to help him commit mass genocide on a neighboring tribe because they have a practice of offering child sacrifices to their gods.  Because Jephthah’s god has ordered that “Thou Shalt Not Kill”, Jephthah finds it his duty to stop their murderous acts.  But get this: he does so by killing the entire tribe.  Murder.  Yes, Jephthah justifies answering murder with murder.  To top it off, Jephthah had made a deal with god so that if Jephthah was successful in his genocide, he promised to sacrifice to his god the first thing that walks through his door upon returning home. (He of course hoping it might be a servant or slave).  Instead, his daughter greets him.  So he keeps his promise to the lord of “Thou shalt not kill” and  murders her as well (after she bewails her virginity).

To all those who applaud what Dr. Tiller’s killer has done, I would like for them to personally tell his wife and children that they think he deserved to die.  Unbelievable behavior….

Understanding why the Catholic church does not allow men to marry is a sticky, muddled mess. It is one of the few differences between the Eastern Byzantine and Roman Catholic branches that split in the Great Schism. In a nutshell, Catholic priests cannot be women because Jesus had a penis (so all priests must have penises like Jesus). Also, priests cannot use their penis for masturbation or sex (in or out of marriage) because the are “brides of Christ”… or grooms of Christ… wait, is that gay? The result is a large population of gay and straight men who cannot help themselves “beat the demon out” and run about horny as toads, many of whom prey on little boys or have secret affairs like our friend Fr. Cutié. Yes, that is his REAL last name.

Fr. Cutié was caught this week by the the tabloids getting cozy with a lady friend. He is a mega-catholic-church priest who was adored by his sheeple, I mean flock, and has a strong media presence on EWTN and in the Spanish community. [read the full Times Article]

The “bride of Christ” code words that are thrown around to describe a priest’s celibacy vows reminds me of so many Christians I know who have a love relationship with Jesus or God that is indistinguishable from a crush on a teacher or pop star. “God is love”, right? To anyone who has had to listen to a virgin, celibate priest’s sermon on how to have a good relationship, I feel your pain. You hear them at weddings all the time. It is akin to asking the Amish how to improve the battery life on your Prius.

Fr. Cutié is just another in the long line of religious hypocrites who say one thing and do another. The very types that this Jesus guy supposedly came to do away with. Celibacy in the church is a joke, and I care naught if it remains as is or changes to allow marriage. One thing is clear: human biology is strong and our DNA wants us to pass on our genes. The unnatural state of forced celibacy does more harm than good in repressing those needs rather than addressing them as parts of the human function. We eat, we sleep, we breath, we have sex.

Hitchen’s book “God is Not Great” presents a detailed look at why religion spoils everything. The extent of logic and examples he presents concerning many different religious cultures and how they commit atrocities will shock even a moderate atheist. His chapter on child abuse and religion was particularly revealing. He describes in depth the torture inflicted on young children through female circumcision in many religions (including Islam) and male circumcision in the Judeo-Christian religion (among others).

I highly recommend this especially to those who wish to know more when demonstrating to the religious how religion does more harm than good. The minimal “good” that religion produces by no means justifies the increasing number of large scale demonstrations of greed, manipulation and bloodshed incurred by religion. I’ll let Hitchens take it from here and plug his own book: