I think you’re a moron for completely different reasons.

If you can’t prove it it doesn’t exist, right? Well what about evolution. Which I’m yet to see any shred of evidence proving it’s real (and don’t give me any excuses as to why we haven’t found any evidence that proves it’s real either.) What about the big bang theory? Spontaneous life? What about any of that?

None of these theories have been proven either and I can see my beliefs from your view point too. You see God as a fairy tale and not a theory. You’re actually very close minded. More than me that’s for sure.

And heaven and earth are two different places. Earth is the place of struggles and heaven is a final reward. You obviously don’t know the difference. Even atheists who use their brains can tell you that.

You know I would keep going, but it’s obvious that you didn’t read or comprehend one thing that I said. When I said ‘if being an atheist is against the law why can’t we erect nativity scenes on public property’. I said that because even if atheists had a problem with it they would be arrested on the spot. You seemed to simply ignore that and post whatever the hell you just posted.

And don’t thank me for posting. I was hoping someone who posted would know what they were talking about, but you obviously don’t. Your first comment about believing in a ‘Christian God’ proves that. If you knew SO much about anything you would know that Christians, Catholics and Jews believe in the same God. You didn’t so I question your knowledge in everything else you just posted.

To answer your point about politics:
In states like Oklahoma there are still active laws on the books that state that someone who does profess faith in a god cannot hold office or testify in court. These laws haven’t been enforced because they are unconstitutional, but the sentiment still holds true in many areas of the USA today. It is difficult to be elected for office unless you profess unsupported belief in a bronze age god.

Setting up a nativity scene on government owned land would be a public display from the government in support of one religion over other religions.

The first amendment states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Erecting a religious scene of any branch or flavor of religion would cross the boundary of government establishing that religion as the favored one. If a group of druids wanted to erect a Triple Goddess symbol on the front lawn of the courtyard, atheists would take issue with that as well, as it is the government displaying favoritism towards one religion.

Thanks for reading and commenting.